LocostUSA.com

Learning how to build Lotus Seven replicas...together!
It is currently April 18, 2024, 7:24 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: March 28, 2020, 1:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: September 24, 2013, 4:06 pm
Posts: 854
Location: Charlotte, NC
WestsideGarage wrote:
I put the numbers in V-susp. It's fun to play with the bump droop and roll, and watch the mysterious colorful lines dance around the screen. But, the data doesn't mean much to me.


I had the same feeling about the suspension. it is all numbers and how does each number translate into feel? Ultimately, I used the info from this forum to get reasonable numbers that I was able to execute (learned to weld building this). Overall, I am very happy with my suspension but I have more camber gain in bump than necessary. The biggest thing for me was to make sure there was no bump steer because I didn't want a twitchy car in mid corner.

Keep going, it looks like it is coming along.

_________________
Gavin

My build: http://www.locostusa.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=16005


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 29, 2020, 11:25 am 
Offline

Joined: March 4, 2017, 9:53 am
Posts: 42
Attachment:
IMG_1362.jpg
Attachment:
IMG_1359.jpg
Attachment:
IMG_1363.jpg


Definitely feels like spring! Usually we would be out on the lake on a day like today, but we're quarantined. So just working on the Locost. I finally finished the trunk area of the chassis. I fabricated the spare tire mount, most locosts I see use a cradle from under the car to hold the tire. I built this pedestal type, but I haven't tacked it on yet. What do you guys think?

The spare is the only tire I have right now, I'm holding off buying the rest. Its a cheep tire, I asked the guys at discount tire to order me a tire that wasn't directional, but sure enough it comes in and it's directional. Since it was their mistake the offered to mount it for free, I'm not to concerned about it since it's just a spare. I plan to use Dunlop Direzza DZ102, Direzza Z3, or the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R. The size is 205/50 15.

I've done some small stuff like build the battery tray, weld on tabs for the fusebox. Started planing the air-intake. Also planing the Brake system, I plan to use AN-3 lines, but I will need a flare tool. AN flare tools are expensive. I also need a better shop manual for the Miata, hopefully with color wiring diagrams. I'm also thinking about ditching the racing seat and just building my own upholstery.

I seem to have a lot of things going on, and not totally finishing anything. I just kind of go out to the garage and just start fiddling with whatever. I think I will build the roll bar today, since I'm working on the back of the car, and I have the 1.5" 14ga DOM tubing. I'm planing on 42" from the bottom of the chassis, but I'll cut it long and do the broom stick test, too set the height 2" above my helmet.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 29, 2020, 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: January 2, 2009, 1:45 pm
Posts: 1322
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
i may be all wet but my understanding is that tire 'directionality' only counts in the wet, so a directional should be fine. Don't expect that you,ll chose to drive in the rain ....

_________________
Warren
Isuzu Pickup/SR20DE, +401 COLD frame
Build Log: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=11601


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 29, 2020, 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: June 20, 2019, 12:34 pm
Posts: 591
I like the spare mounting you built. Nice location and should be more than strong enough.

Thom

_________________
Thom


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 29, 2020, 2:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: March 4, 2017, 9:53 am
Posts: 42
Warren Nethercote wrote:
i may be all wet but my understanding is that tire 'directionality' only counts in the wet, so a directional should be fine. Don't expect that you,ll chose to drive in the rain ....


An interesting thought. The spare is really just there incase I need to limp the car to the nearest tire store or home. Plus I've got a 50% chance of the tread facing the right way! :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 29, 2020, 2:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: March 4, 2017, 9:53 am
Posts: 42
BostonWill wrote:
I like the spare mounting you built. Nice location and should be more than strong enough.

Thom


I think it will work. The only problem is it will make installing the sheet metal on the rear panel more difficult. I'm thinking of a way to make the thing removable.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 29, 2020, 2:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: March 4, 2017, 9:53 am
Posts: 42
Attachment:
IMG_1365.jpg


This is a question for you Auto-x racers out there. Do I need a diagonal brace across the hoop to pass tech. I would like to leave it open, because that bar would be right behind my head!

Hot mess isn't a purpose built competition vehicle, obviously. :roll: I just want to do sports car stuff with it, at some point I will probably try autocross. I plan to drive it on the street, just a weekend cruiser.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 29, 2020, 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: August 2, 2009, 3:34 pm
Posts: 896
Location: Alberta
I don't know if it's specifically required for autocross, but IMO, you are going to have other issues to worry about if your head is going through the seat and you're concerned about contact with the bar. I'd recommend a diagonal, helps the roll bar from simply folding on itself. If you put the low connection on the passenger side and it connects at the high point on the drivers side, it looks like you'd be well clear of your head swiveling and hitting the bar.

_________________
Trochu Motor League


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 29, 2020, 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: October 15, 2006, 11:15 am
Posts: 942
The latest scca rule book "suggest" having one. It's designed to prevent the main hoop from losanging i.e. moving sideways. I would say double check with your local club.

Yes it may be behind you head, but thats not a bad thing to have if you add a form of head restraint.

Cheers
Fred


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: March 31, 2020, 2:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: September 24, 2013, 4:06 pm
Posts: 854
Location: Charlotte, NC
Here is an article for the SCCA time trial rules.
https://timetrials.scca.com/pages/safety

Granted, this isn't auto-x but if you ever decide to do a hill climb or some type of track event (HPDE etc.) you might want to build it to the highest level of driving event you hope to participate in. Our local chapter seems to be pretty relaxed on rollbars. I over built mine and I am happy knowing that, if I need it, it will hold.

_________________
Gavin

My build: http://www.locostusa.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=16005


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: April 1, 2020, 8:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: March 4, 2017, 9:53 am
Posts: 42
Attachment:
IMG_1369.jpg

Thanks for the replies. Everyone has made some good points. I should put a diagonal in there. I'm a getting little less nervous about my head hitting roll bar, but am now just getting nervous about just driving the thing in regular traffic. Basically the car has started to materialize from pipe dream, too something I might actually drive one day. I tacked in the stanchions to the main hoop. I have them tacked to the bottom rear of the chassis as shown in "the book" in the racing section. I added some extra 1/8 plate in that area. It looks to me like the rollbar/ car would fold lengthwise vs crush diagonally across it's width. This and concerns for driving in traffic has me thinking about building a full cage.

The 1 1/2 14 ga DOM tube seems very strong, and really not that heavy. I think the 20' tube weighed less than 40 lbs. I think adding one more tube for a full cage would be worth it. I don't really mind it will make the car look more like a dune buggy. As Mnot pointed it would make the car legal for other motorsport stuff.

I didn't have a clear vision when I started building, the car keeps evolving.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: April 1, 2020, 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: June 20, 2019, 12:34 pm
Posts: 591
WestsideGarage wrote:
BostonWill wrote:
I like the spare mounting you built. Nice location and should be more than strong enough.

Thom


I think it will work. The only problem is it will make installing the sheet metal on the rear panel more difficult. I'm thinking of a way to make the thing removable.


If you cut the horz tube and inserted an internal tube with thru bolts, you could just cut a circle out for the mount then bolt on the mount.

_________________
Thom


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: April 5, 2020, 9:11 am 
Offline

Joined: March 4, 2017, 9:53 am
Posts: 42
Attachment:
60772615645__F2600E12-25C5-4C3D-A4E2-D8A94312178B.jpg


I built this crude mock up using rear struts from a 97 Honda Civic. The Strut is installed upside down to clear the upper A arm. The strut will rest in a coil bucket built into the lower control arm. The weight of the car is on the lower ball joint in this picture. I used a high lift jack to raise the chassis to check droop, and just jumped up and down on the chassis to check bump. Also removed the spring and checked travel with just the shock. Travel is 5".

The main concern I can think of with this set-up is that the strut mount bushing is not really designed to pivot. The bushing doesn't bind in travel but this probably isn't ideal. The coil bucket will be angled to allow the bushing to be flat at ride height.

The positive aspect of this strut is that they are cheep, and upgrades are available.

Thoughts, criticism, concerns?


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: April 5, 2020, 12:20 pm 
Offline
Automotive Encyclopedia
User avatar

Joined: December 22, 2006, 2:05 pm
Posts: 8044
It might be ok to invert without early failure. I assume the oem strut is monotube gas.
One concern is once the rack is located correctly for ackerman, clearance to the left spring with full left lock.

Rockers with inboard struts and pushrods would solve both potential problems.

_________________
Miata UBJ: ES-2074R('70s maz pickup)
Ford IFS viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13225&p=134742
Simple Spring select viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11815
LxWxHt
360LA 442E: 134.5x46x15
Lotus7:115x39x7.25
Tiger Avon:114x40x13.3-12.6
Champion/Book:114x42x11
Gibbs/Haynes:122x42x14
VoDou:113x44x14
McSorley 442:122x46x14
Collins 241:127x46x12


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: April 7, 2020, 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: March 4, 2017, 9:53 am
Posts: 42
Miatav8,MstrASE,A&P,F wrote:
It might be ok to invert without early failure. I assume the oem strut is monotube gas.
One concern is once the rack is located correctly for ackerman, clearance to the left spring with full left lock.

Rockers with inboard struts and pushrods would solve both potential problems.


Aha... the steering arm would be awful close to the coil spring, at full lock with the strut inverted. I don't have the steering rack mounted yet, I still need to shorten it, and order mounting bushings.

After some consideration, I think I'm going to have to install the strut as it was intended by Honda. I don't think the flat bushing, the shock shaft, and the spring will handle the articulation of the LCA. I thought about making a small strut tower and welding it to the top rail. I might have to modify the Upper A arm or even remake them. On my lunch break, I made a little sketch of what I'm thinking about;
Attachment:
IMG_1378.jpg


If I have to remake the Upper a arm, I may use bushings, instead of Heim joints. I'm not crazy about Heim joints on a road car. Now that I have built a suspension, and seen how it works I doubt I'll ever change the caster. This would greatly simplify the A-arm. I think camber and toe are all that is needed avoid uneven tire ware.

Also I think the strut towers would be partially hidden by the head lights, might not look too odd.

Push rod suspension is impressive, and probably great for a track car. Or for some one who knows what they're doing. Right now I'm trying to simplify things. Still learning a lot. THanks


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
POWERED_BY