LocostUSA.com

Learning how to build Lotus Seven replicas...together!
It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 2:42 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:03 pm
Posts: 352
Location: Whitby, Ontario
Ouch. But it probably relates to replacement wrap around bumpers on modern cars so not toooo bad :)


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 421
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Tom17 wrote:
Ouch. But it probably relates to replacement wrap around bumpers on modern cars so not toooo bad :)
About 38% more than buying them from Kinetic, not considering freight.

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:36 pm
Posts: 24
Location: SE Wisconsin
Steve,

Have you made any further progress on your design?

John


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 12:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 421
Location: Meridian, Idaho
johnfromwis wrote:
Steve,

Have you made any further progress on your design?

John

Regrettably no. Work and family have taken priority, and I got side-tracked a little putting a new engine in a friend's daily driver. Did you get my e-mail about the CAD files?

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:36 pm
Posts: 24
Location: SE Wisconsin
No, I checked my email. Maybe its in the trash, let me check.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:09 pm
Posts: 15
Wow this is too cool somebody building something really close to a real caterham. I've seen a few others, but none have had this level of sharing. Perhaps by the time I finish my master's degree (a year and a half or so) I can really start to play with this and follow in your foot steps. It looks great though keep up the great work and keep us updated.

-Greg


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 421
Location: Meridian, Idaho
I have essentially been traveling for work for the last two months straight and haven't had time to spend in the garage, but I was able to sneak a visit to the Caterham Midlands dealership into my itinerary! :wink:

They had an R500 and the prototype Team Lotus Special Edition 7 on the floor as well as several very nice S3 and SV's. That's me with the sh*t eatin' grin in the R500. Unfortunately I didn't have the time to take one for a spin, but it was still a great dose of motivation to get back into the 7 project!


Attachments:
IMG_5326_Low Res.jpg
IMG_5326_Low Res.jpg [ 96.55 KiB | Viewed 1196 times ]
IMG_5323_Low Res.jpg
IMG_5323_Low Res.jpg [ 93.68 KiB | Viewed 1196 times ]
IMG_5321_Low Res.jpg
IMG_5321_Low Res.jpg [ 82.2 KiB | Viewed 1196 times ]

_________________
Steve
Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 5:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 421
Location: Meridian, Idaho
I have been pondering recently on how to design the lower front wishbones around the rather cumbersome mounting arrangement of the stock Miata ball joints.
Attachment:
File comment: Ugh!
Miata MX5 Lower Ball Joint.jpg
Miata MX5 Lower Ball Joint.jpg [ 34.97 KiB | Viewed 1132 times ]

Ideally, I would like to replace the Miata ball joints with readily available press-in type ball joints. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to come across a loaded type ball joint with the same stud taper and diameter that wasn't originally used in a 1960's muscle car and is the size of my fist! Also, I don't want to re-ream the Miata uprights if I don't have to. So instead I have started looking at if I can replicate the design of the Caterham lower wishbones which use a spherical bearing specifically designed for racing suspensions and proven in day-to-day use in Sevens for decades.
Attachment:
File comment: Simple and elegant...
Caterham Braced Lower Wishbone_1994 Onward.jpg
Caterham Braced Lower Wishbone_1994 Onward.jpg [ 64.23 KiB | Viewed 1132 times ]

A few minutes of Googling and I found the manufacturer and part number of the spherical bearing. It is a New Hampshire Ball Bearing (NHBB) model ABWT10. At about $40 each they are comparable in cost to a reputable brand Miata lower ball joint. So far, so good.
Attachment:
ABWT10.jpg
ABWT10.jpg [ 53.69 KiB | Viewed 1132 times ]

A bit of layout time in CAD, a bit of rendering time and voilà!
Attachment:
LCA_Low Res.jpg
LCA_Low Res.jpg [ 483.62 KiB | Viewed 1132 times ]

Attachment:
LCA_Render_001.JPG
LCA_Render_001.JPG [ 73.64 KiB | Viewed 1132 times ]

I haven't been able to find commercially available bearing housings and taper studs yet. It looks like the bearing housings will have to be custom machined. For the taper studs, the ones used on early model Mustang bump steer kits look promising. Mazda used the same 1-1/2" per foot taper as Ford. When I get a chance I am going to see if a Mustang outer tie rod end fits in the Miata upright.
Attachment:
Steeroids Tapered Outer Tie Rod Bolt_67-69 Mustang Spindle.jpg
Steeroids Tapered Outer Tie Rod Bolt_67-69 Mustang Spindle.jpg [ 15.2 KiB | Viewed 1132 times ]

Keeping my fingers crossed....

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:05 am 
Offline
Always Moore!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:40 pm
Posts: 2812
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Chassis Shop and some other circle track suppliers offer spherical bearing housings for a -8 or larger bearing. Might be worth checking them out if you don't want to do anything custom.

I would also keep an eye on the deflection angle. NHBB's website says that bearing has 12 degrees of deflection. Based on the experiences with my car this number sounds like it might be a little low* - I'd just keep an eye on it so you don't find out when its too late.

*my car also deviates from the book; actual results may vary

_________________
-Andrew
Build Log
Youtube


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 421
Location: Meridian, Idaho
a.moore wrote:
Chassis Shop and some other circle track suppliers offer spherical bearing housings for a -8 or larger bearing. Might be worth checking them out if you don't want to do anything custom.

Thanks Andrew for suggesting Chassis Shop. They offer Aurora Bearing Company's COM series of bearings. The size 10 COM bearing only has about 40% of the NHBB ABWT10's ultimate static radial load rating and is limited to 8.5 degrees of misalignment. The larger sizes aren't much better. The Uni-Ball Weld Cup would have been perfect.... :( At least I can blatantly copy its dimensions and I have a snap ring selected! :D

Image

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 11:57 am
Posts: 212
Location: Waterloo, WI
Those are '94 spindles? I'm trying to figure out what the difference is between earlier (94-97) spindles and later ones. Any thoughts?

Nice looking work! 8)

_________________
-Keith


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 421
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Acerguy wrote:
What year Miata spindles are those? I'm trying to figure out what the difference is between earlier (94-97) spindles and later ones.

They are '94-'97 NA's. Basically the same as '89-'93 NA's. '99+ NB's have the tie rod attachments raised 7.1mm. There are other differences between the NA and NB front suspensions, but those are in the control arms, not the spindles.

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 11:57 am
Posts: 212
Location: Waterloo, WI
Awesome. Thanks. That's just what I needed to know! Oh, and you have a PM. :D

_________________
-Keith


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:19 pm
Posts: 421
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Well, I am a bit closer to finding commercially available components to replace the Miata LBJ with a spherical bearing.

Light Racing out of Longmont, Colorado sells the correct size weld cup for the NHBB ABWT10 bearing complete with a snap ring for just $16.15 each. The only problem is that they are just 0.84" tall which might not be enough to accomodate the angle at which it will be welded to the control arm tubes. Maybe some nice flat streamline tubing will solve that challenge. :wink:

http://www.lightracing.com/products/57-spherical-bearing-receivers

I have also discovered that the dimensions of the Miata lower ball joint's tapered stud are about the same as that of an '87-'96 Ford F150 pick-up truck's outer tie rod end. Who woulda thunk it?

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve's Miata-Based Build
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 5:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 5:20 am
Posts: 83
Location: New Zealand
Steve there are press in ball joints that fit the Mazda taper. One that I do know that fits is the ones used in the Nissan Silvia (200sx) as I have some here, just not sure if you can buy them seperate from the arms, but they are easy enough to press out. The other I am told is from a Ford, just not sure which model but could find out if you would really like to know. Your design looks great, nice and clean. I did consider using the Nissan ball joints but in the end opted for the originals, as they gave me more ability to lower the arm in relation to the b/j centres so that I could clear the tie rod. I will have them finished soon I hope so will have something to show you.
Bruce


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], JackMcCornack and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group