LocostUSA.com

Learning how to build Lotus Seven replicas...together!
It is currently May 19, 2024, 1:36 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 451 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 27, 28, 29, 30, 31  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: February 10, 2011, 9:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: July 6, 2008, 11:15 am
Posts: 1047
Location: Cave Creek, AZ
JonW wrote:
At my advanced age,


Then my age must be the retarded age...

Nice build. A modern day dune buggy for the street. Love it.

Tom

_________________
Sometimes, I'm as confused as a baby in a topless bar.

My short term memory is absolutely horrible and so is my short term memory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG16m2e4O6I


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: February 11, 2011, 11:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 15, 2009, 7:41 pm
Posts: 550
Off Road SHO wrote:
JonW wrote:
At my advanced age,


Then my age must be the retarded age...


That sounds familiar...except I think mine is the F'n retarted age. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: February 20, 2011, 11:23 am 
Offline

Joined: May 14, 2010, 1:08 pm
Posts: 2
The original At-om design & yours has the lower side tube of the chassis a third to half way up the side of the car. Did you ever consider adding a 3rd side tube at the bottom of the chassis? This might have eliminated a lot of the under structure for the seats, etc. & simplified the construction of the "under body tub".

Any comments on your thought process on this part of the design? I know that the additional weight would be a concern, but would there have been any advantages?

Thanks, Doug


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: February 20, 2011, 12:18 pm 
Offline
Locostering Legend
User avatar

Joined: December 27, 2005, 8:13 pm
Posts: 787
There was no thought process involved. I was trying to replicate the shape/construction of the original car. The only changes were to the roll-over safety and the need for a real windshield. I like the look of the suspended cockpit pan


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: June 8, 2011, 12:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: September 19, 2009, 12:33 pm
Posts: 498
JonW wrote:
Well I just passd a major milestone. My son and I bent the top tubes. We used a bar to keep the tubes from spiraling while rolling them through the bender. The bottom oak rollers lasted just long enough to finish the 4th tube. Bends are not perfect but they'll do. (Look like they were done by amateurs.) I'll have to make aluminum bottom rollers to bend any more tubes (for next car). Roll bar and windshield frame will be bent with JD2 die bender.

I anticipated this to be the most difficult phase of the build. It's a relief to have it completed. The rest of the frame should move quickly. About 80 more tubing notches to go.........


One thing I can't quite tell from these pictures - how did you prepare the front suspension box for attachment to the upper frame tubes? Did you somehow notch the corner of the suspension box so that it fit around the round tube?

_________________
Ford 5.0 into an M3
mikaelvroom.com | @MikaelVroom


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: June 8, 2011, 1:38 pm 
Offline
Locostering Legend
User avatar

Joined: December 27, 2005, 8:13 pm
Posts: 787
I notched the main (2" dia) tubes to accept the front end of the front susp box. Same for rear box.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: August 9, 2011, 2:10 am 
Offline

Joined: August 9, 2011, 1:26 am
Posts: 6
Location: Charlotte, NC, sometimes in Ohio
I just spent an hour reading through this thread. Inspiration for me to get my project rolling!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: January 19, 2012, 7:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: October 19, 2009, 9:36 pm
Posts: 2199
Location: meadview arizona
have you measured up the porsche running gear for roadster #3 yet, mid engined?

_________________
this story shall the good man teach his son,
and chrispin chrispian shall ne'er go by,
from this day to the end of the world.
but we in it shall be remembered.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: January 19, 2012, 7:22 pm 
Offline
Locostering Legend
User avatar

Joined: December 27, 2005, 8:13 pm
Posts: 787
It's on the build table but there is no building activity. I'm collecting components between helping to liquidate my father's 15-car fleet. Engine/trans (2 liter) is a mock-up loaner.

I started some sketches with basic dimensions.

What dimensoions are you looking for?


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: January 19, 2012, 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 11, 2006, 10:27 pm
Posts: 569
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Hey, do you have any more of those center steer racks lying around :lol: ?

_________________
Graham,
www.earleymotorsports.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: January 19, 2012, 7:33 pm 
Offline
Locostering Legend
User avatar

Joined: December 27, 2005, 8:13 pm
Posts: 787
914 rack, Ebay $80
kind of big and heavy
check back in a year


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: January 19, 2012, 11:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 11, 2006, 10:27 pm
Posts: 569
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Thanks.
:cheers:

_________________
Graham,
www.earleymotorsports.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: E- brake Mount
PostPosted: August 20, 2013, 1:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: April 2, 2009, 6:53 pm
Posts: 51
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
How is the rear e-brake mount working out? I have the same Wilwood mechanical spot caliper to mount on my Locost and am considering a solid, non-floating mount like yours.

Any feedback on the design or implementation? My car is far from a daily driver, but I would like it to be usable on weekend drives around town.

Thanks,
Aaron


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: August 20, 2013, 4:49 pm 
Offline
Locostering Legend
User avatar

Joined: December 27, 2005, 8:13 pm
Posts: 787
I don't use it often. Main shortcoming is that the hand lever is not solidly anchored (slides on my coolant pipes).

It does work since the fixed mount deflects enough to allow it to clamp both sides. I do think that it needs more leverage multiplication due to small amount of brake arm movement. I used a std Civic hand lever from a '79.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Low-Cost At-om VTEC
PostPosted: August 20, 2013, 6:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: April 2, 2009, 6:53 pm
Posts: 51
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
JonW wrote:
I don't use it often. Main shortcoming is that the hand lever is not solidly anchored (slides on my coolant pipes).

It does work since the fixed mount deflects enough to allow it to clamp both sides. I do think that it needs more leverage multiplication due to small amount of brake arm movement. I used a std Civic hand lever from a '79.


So it does work to keep the car stationary. What is your car weight? Mine weighs 1130lbs. with a full fuel load. I also have a Civic lever, albeit from 1990 or so, likely the same design. What gauge or thickness steel did you use for the mount?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 451 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 27, 28, 29, 30, 31  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
POWERED_BY