phil wrote:
Engine bay dimensions?
And your opinion the robustness when it comes to a possible sbc base (using the 928 running gear)?
Thank you very much for the help
You may want to take a look at Sorley,s 7 +442 below
http://sevenesque.com/plans/and this
http://www.virtualv8.com/chassis3.htmMy own view would be to follow the Australian suggestions to add more tubes, but in addition I would make the upper and lower rails 1.25 inch tuves. The suspension tube components would also be heavier
[/quote]
Yes, engine bay dimensions. Bottom rail to top rail, side to side and firewall to radiator brace.
Already looked at the 442E (earlier in the thread). Staying with 1" rails but adding more tubes for triangulation, probably use the entire 928 irs but no doubt the front wishbones will need to be larger (especially for the 928 hubs, rotors and calipers.
Thanks for that link. Pity they don't supply plans though.