Interesting comments here. And while I'm not in complete agreement with the OP, we should consider the positive aspects of his critique.
J1000 wrote:
Came for the old fashioned driving experience, not for an old fashioned internet experience.
He sent me a personal email that was considerably less subtle (adjectives included "old" and "outdated" and "dying") about this web site (and "ridiculous" about my advice). Do y'all think we're missing out by having such a DIY internet interface, to go along with our DIY cars?
J1000 wrote:
You are lecturing me about the native resolution of the camera in my phone that's 5 years old.
That wasn't my intent, it was more about how to make one's posts presentable, so more people will read them. I've been shrinking my own photos for LocostUSA since back in the Bush administration, but it may have been a more common need back then, and technology may be passing us by.
J1000 wrote:
Every other site on the internet automatically resizes it.
I don't think the OP is going to repost here, but he has an interesting project and has reasonable questions. You can help him out at:
https://usa7s.net/ips/topic/13973-what- ... ent-129918He has a valid point -- the usa7s.net has a more modern web site (and a $20 annual membership fee, at least some of which is apparently invested in upgrading the site's software), and one of its features is autoscaling to fit the page. Quoting from the same photo I tracked in my response, the Get Info reads...
4,032px × 2,268px (scaled to 1,000px × 563px)
...and ours just says 4,032px × 2,268px, which is about sixteen times the screen real estate required for 1,000px × 563px. I'm sure locostusa could get the same autoscaling for similar money. But should we?
_________________
Locost builder and adventurer, and owner/operator of
http://www.kineticvehicles.com