Miatav8,MstrASE,A&P,F wrote:
I know. Ideal to me is low cost and commonly done so fewer potential problems to figure out on my own.
Most universal FPR have a vac port and will work for boosted or NA.
The older return system is more cost effective and I don't know that ms supports variable pump output.
The return and regulator should be added as close to the rail as practical and helps prevent vapor lock by constantly circulating fuel in the lines up to the tee.
If you keep operating pressures with the return system similar to the oem returnless, the oem injectors should be fine so no need to swap. If after fine tuning they are operating at an excessive duty cycle, then you might want to upgrade to slightly higher flow injectors or slightly increase operating pressure.
Use an ethanol compatible fpr. 5/16 lines in nylon or steel should be fine. Aeromotive makes high quality fprs.
are returnless systems more comon on high pressure designs? The Duratec is using 55psi on a return less system. I am not stuck on that persay, just trying to decide what makes most sense. on a 2.5l I doubt I will be pushing the fuel system much. Maybe I need to look into what control methods and sensing options are on the engine stock my initial thought was a 60gph 60psi inline pump close to the sump. meeting engine demand for pressure with plenty of flow overhead. That leaves the question of pressure regulator before or after the fuel rail, and or possibly an aftermarket fuel rail. The JAZ tank has ports for return if I want to use it. I am just not that knowledgeable on fuel systems compared to other aspects.
I am looking at this pump which meets the needs of the fuel system, but should I look for more pressure headroom?
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/msd-2225