SkinnyG wrote:You're not going to -regret- wearing a mask.
You are not going to -regret- wearing a seatbelt.
You are not going to -regret- using a condom.
The problem is wearing a mask is more align with the pullout method.
Moderators: dhempy, a.moore, horizenjob
SkinnyG wrote:You're not going to -regret- wearing a mask.
You are not going to -regret- wearing a seatbelt.
You are not going to -regret- using a condom.
Driven5 wrote:Regardless of what a meme might say, all of the reputable science has repeatedly continued to demonstrate the substantial effectiveness of multi-layer cloth masks.
So. Much. Irony.Trochu wrote:What it has done, is give the average citizen the ability to decided which is "reputable" depending on if the abstract supports their way of thinking or not.
I'd love to see some links to these studies that you personally have deemed as reputable, against the consensus of the vast majority of the scientific community, since I like to form my own take-aways from the actual source of the data rather than a biased third party synopsis. There are many intricacies to what conclusions actually can and can't be drawn from any given study, and the conclusions frequently being cherry picked in an effort to push against the grain are more often than not largely or entirely unjustified in my experience. Note that what you specifically said in 'reducing the spread of COVID' can actually be quite different than masks themselves being ineffective at preventing transmission, depending on how other transmission prevention precautions are or aren't being controlled for. Doing any type of "in the public" study is notoriously difficult to perform in any meaningful way with as severely limited as our historical data set is still.Trochu wrote:...but as far as I'm aware, every single actual study performed in the public has determined that masks are "negligible" in reducing the spread of Covid19.
chrisser wrote:May be in the minority, but at least I'm consistent. I've been saying the same thing since April.
Give me the virus. I'm in my early 50s, in good health. I can schedule 14 days off, be sick on my terms and be done with it. If I have a bad reaction, then we won't have to waste time testing for Covid because we'll know where it came from. We can schedule it when there are plenty of ICU beds just in case. Could have done this in the summer where there's plenty of sun (vitamin-d) and no chance of weather-related complications.
If I get it now, it will be unplanned, I'll probably end up spreading it before I get diagnosed, we're in the middle of winter with lots of other bugs going around, my immune system is low and it's cold and wet outside. Plus, with the holidays, it's likely it would get spread by me even further. And I could have another cold or the flu at the same time. And now I'm cooped up inside with the windows closed so my wife would almost definitely get it at the same time.
Granted, this type of action wouldn't apply to everyone. But just think how much further we'd be along towards herd immunity if we had just done a controlled infection of the healthy these last nine months.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests