Steel Tubing Question
Moderators: a.moore, horizenjob
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: May 30, 2006, 8:47 pm
Steel Tubing Question
I know "the book", as well as every other build I have seen has used 16 gauge steel. But... I have come across more than enough 1/8" thick tubing for FREE. Does anyone have any idea what kind of weight that would add? Other than saving a hundred plus bucks and adding weight, are there any positives or negatives I need to consider when thinking of using this thicker steel?
Thanks!!
Thanks!!
-
- Posts: 7043
- Joined: August 15, 2005, 10:13 pm
- Building: positive attitude
- Location: Charleston, WV
Well on the upside it gives you some extra incentive to use that high powered V8 engine you've dreamed about. As far as how much weight it would add I'm guessing it would just about double your chassis weight. If the steel tubing is in good shape maybe you could work out an exchange deal with a local steel distributor. If he traded you even he would be coming out ahead and you would have something you could better use.
- mr.peabody.d
- Locostering Information Liaison
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: August 17, 2005, 1:30 am
- Location: So CALIFORNIA
Depending on how LOCOST you wanna go....
True to your name... fire yourself and Jump at the chance....but compensate with a robust engine to balance it out.
OR pay $120-$150 dollars for the 16 gauge steel......like I said it depends on how low cost you are.
*one more suggestion it to take the metal and pratice welding, build a frame, if cost is really and issue use it....but your weilding slills advance...if you decidel to switch your can make furiture or a welding rack or a automatic beer dispensor....
The point is it is FREE
True to your name... fire yourself and Jump at the chance....but compensate with a robust engine to balance it out.
OR pay $120-$150 dollars for the 16 gauge steel......like I said it depends on how low cost you are.
*one more suggestion it to take the metal and pratice welding, build a frame, if cost is really and issue use it....but your weilding slills advance...if you decidel to switch your can make furiture or a welding rack or a automatic beer dispensor....
The point is it is FREE
I'll keep an eye out for you!
To err is human...
I am more human than most.
To err is human...
I am more human than most.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: May 30, 2006, 8:47 pm
-
- Posts: 7043
- Joined: August 15, 2005, 10:13 pm
- Building: positive attitude
- Location: Charleston, WV
Check this weight calculator out:
http://www.processassociates.com/proces ... beprop.htm
The following are for round steel tubing so the weights will be different than for square tube, but they do provide an apples to apples comparison.
1/8 inch thickness equals .125 in decimal. The closest pipe guage I could find to that in decimal was 11ga which is .120 so I used that in the calculator. It comes out at 1.1278lbs/ft.
The book suggests 16ga which is .065 thick and comes in at .649 lbs/ft.
Multiply these numbers by 110 to get a chassis worth of tubing and you get:
1/8 tubing chassis: 124.058lbs
16ga chassis:71.39lbs
So it will be nearly twice as heavy.
http://www.processassociates.com/proces ... beprop.htm
The following are for round steel tubing so the weights will be different than for square tube, but they do provide an apples to apples comparison.
1/8 inch thickness equals .125 in decimal. The closest pipe guage I could find to that in decimal was 11ga which is .120 so I used that in the calculator. It comes out at 1.1278lbs/ft.
The book suggests 16ga which is .065 thick and comes in at .649 lbs/ft.
Multiply these numbers by 110 to get a chassis worth of tubing and you get:
1/8 tubing chassis: 124.058lbs
16ga chassis:71.39lbs
So it will be nearly twice as heavy.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: May 31, 2006, 12:55 pm
- Building: SR20DET Locost
- Location: Clarence Creek, Ontario
steel tubing question
Hi Hellfrog,
A quick check at my metal suppliers websites (most tubing & steel suppliers have tables showing sizes & weights for their products) shows
3/4" sq .065 = .606 lb/ft
.120 = 1.03 lb/ft
1" sq .065 = .83 lb/ft
.120 = 1.436 lb/ft
Basically about 70% increase in weight.
Hope this helps
Dan
Navan, ON
A quick check at my metal suppliers websites (most tubing & steel suppliers have tables showing sizes & weights for their products) shows
3/4" sq .065 = .606 lb/ft
.120 = 1.03 lb/ft
1" sq .065 = .83 lb/ft
.120 = 1.436 lb/ft
Basically about 70% increase in weight.
Hope this helps
Dan
Navan, ON
Hellfrog,
I think if the tubing is clean inside, it is a good deal. Is it clean? Or rusty?
I also liked the suggestion of the lower rails being the thicker stuff. Great suggestion. I would also consider increasing the tube thickness where ever the suspension pieces are attached to the chassis.
Even the % increase in weight, it is not really much extra weight.
I think if the tubing is clean inside, it is a good deal. Is it clean? Or rusty?
I also liked the suggestion of the lower rails being the thicker stuff. Great suggestion. I would also consider increasing the tube thickness where ever the suspension pieces are attached to the chassis.
Even the % increase in weight, it is not really much extra weight.
I am using a 351/392 V* so I need a bit more chassis stiffness. I am also considering turning the tub section into somewhat a full cage with upright at front & rear of tub possibly upper rail in the tub area being 1/8. While this will add weight it will be low and centered so should be handling neutral.
- mr.peabody.d
- Locostering Information Liaison
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: August 17, 2005, 1:30 am
- Location: So CALIFORNIA
I really like that the idea locostv8 With your application the bottom rail, suspension points, and the cockpit area would be a minimum.
I really like the idea of a strenghten cockpit area maybe incorperating the windscreen into the design and angling it back a little more. (The challenge would be to build strong crash/roll over protection while still being able to get in and out and preserving the open air qualities)
I really like the idea of a strenghten cockpit area maybe incorperating the windscreen into the design and angling it back a little more. (The challenge would be to build strong crash/roll over protection while still being able to get in and out and preserving the open air qualities)
I'll keep an eye out for you!
To err is human...
I am more human than most.
To err is human...
I am more human than most.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests